[Year 12 IPM] Multichoice Q5

Meadows, Roslyn M Meadows.Roslyn.M at edumail.vic.gov.au
Thu Nov 10 10:20:57 EST 2005


My two bob's worth - if the teachers of the subject cannot agree on an answer, then obviously the question is flawed. 
 
Every question on an exam should have a correct answer that should be obvious to those students who have gained the knowledge of the subject through study and have the analytical skills needed to apply that knowledge to a new situation. 
 
And the answer whould be obvious to a group of teachers who teach the subject - if not then the question should be never have appeared.
 
'Trick' questions (IMHO) serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever, and do not necessarily sort out the excellent students from the mediocre. And of course in Multiple Choice there will always be the students who guess and still get it correct.
 
 
Ros Meadows
Bentleigh SC
9579 1044
meadows.roslyn.m at edumail.vic.gov.au
 
"Furious activity is no substitute for understanding." H. H. Williams 

________________________________

From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of Mark Scott
Sent: Wed 11/9/2005 7:02 PM
To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management Teachers'Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Year 12 IPM] Multichoice Q5


 
A good student should recognise all of the references to copyright as nonsense (and hence irrelevant) and put response (d) mandatory as the correct response.
 
Mark Scott
Luther College

________________________________

From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of Mark Kelly
Sent: Wed 9/11/2005 6:17 PM
To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management Teachers'Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Year 12 IPM] Multichoice Q5



Hmmm.  Indeed, it is difficult, stupid, and confusing, but I beg to
disagree that a good student should deliver an obvious answer.

What *is* the obvious answer?

When it says "THIS is an example..." does "this" refer to the "copyright
details" (optional), "charges" (mandatory) or "GST charges" (mandatory)?

After all, there are 3 items listed on the invoice.

The question is fatally flawed.  A 'good student' might guess the
question was referring to the GST charges, but a top student could also
say "optional" and deserve full marks.

Students should NOT have to read the examiners' minds and compensate for
seriously deficient questions.

This question is the worst I have ever seen in an IPM exam.


Mark Scott wrote:
> Diificult, stupid, confusing question but one with an obvious answer.
> 
> It was certainly a test for students. Good students will be fine.
> 
> Mark Scott
> Luther College
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of Mark Kelly
> Sent: Wed 9/11/2005 1:51 PM
> To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management Teachers'Mailing List
> Subject: [Year 12 IPM] Multichoice Q5
>
>
>
> I guess it's safe to talk now.
>
> Has anyone else noticed something odd about multichoice Q5...
>
> Question 5
>
> Crazy Cartoons applies for and receives copyright for all cartoons
> created by its artists. On their invoice to a client, Crazy Cartoons
> lists the copyright details and charges and the GST charges related to
> the copyright. This is an example of which type of convention?
>
> A. preset
> B. optional
> C. preferred
> D. mandatory
>
>
> I mean - what the...?
>
> If I understand copyright law in Australia, one does NOT apply for
> copyright and have it granted (as one does for Trade Marks and patents).
>   Copyright is *automatically* held by the creator of intellectual property.
>
> So what's this about a company applying for and receiving copyright??
>
> Secondly, what on earth does the rest of it mean?  I'm truly baffled.
>
> Does Crazy Cartoons create cartoons and sell them to clients?  If so,
> what's the stuff about copyright details on the invoice for?  What
> 'copyright details'??  And what are the 'GST charges related to the
> copyright'???
>
> OR does Crazy Cartoons earn its money by getting copyright for its
> clients' cartoons?  (Which is impossible anyway)
>
> Is this question completely insane or am I missing something obvious?
>
> --
> Mark Kelly

--
Mark Kelly
McKinnon Secondary College
IPM Lecture notes: http://vceit.com
Moderator: IPM Mailing List
_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
IPM Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
http://www.vitta.org.au  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc




Important - 
This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education & Training.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8409 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/ipm/attachments/20051110/eab05b0d/attachment.bin


More information about the ipm mailing list