[Year 12 IT Apps] OT: Rudd Money and Off Topic discussion

Mark Scott msc at luther.vic.edu.au
Thu Sep 4 11:02:41 EST 2008


One of the problems may be the hijacking of the list that goes on.

Some posters use it as an off-topic list because they know that they can reach more people and schools that way.

Mark Scott
"If you don't change direction, you will probably end up where you are heading." Sara Felder



-----Original Message-----
From: itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Graham Gales
Sent: Thursday, 4 September 2008 10:36 AM
To: Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Year 12 IT Apps] OT: Rudd Money and Off Topic discussion

G'day ....

OT content appears every so often and can look as though it will overtake the ITA content ... But, IMHO, generally it fades away in a short time and, as stated in another email, nearly all OT content here relates to ICT issues and events occurring in or relevant to Education/ schools, not the usual OT of sport, sex, politics, etc.  No OT thread seems to last more than a couple of days and many people who respond to OT threads often invite other interested parties to respond to them off-list.

Personally I am happy with the way the list operates at present and do not see OT material as affecting my use of the list.

Graham Gales
Bright P-12 College


On 9/4/08 10:19 AM, "Mark Kelly" <kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au> wrote:

> Hi Adrian.  I'm sympathetic - I go OT myself occasionally because this
> is where most of the people are - but lengthy OT threads do pollute
> the purpose of the list, and they do annoy people.
>
> I don't mind deleting the occasional OT, but when they drown out
> legitimate postings they kill the reason for coming here.  People are
> here because the list is useful to their ITA needs.  Reduce that
> usefulness, and people leave.
>
> Usenet has long known this problem, and the only Usenet groups that
> tend to thrive nowadays are the moderated ones.
>
> I've maintained a loose hold on the reins here, allowing minor and
> brief OT threads, especially if topics are hot and urgent (e.g.
> reporting or Rudd at certain times).  But continuous OT is a different matter.
>
> At the risk of sparking an OT flood, what do Kevork and other people
> here think?

<snip>


Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe IT Applications Mailing List kindly supported by http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/itapplications3-4.html - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and http://www.vitta.org.au  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc



More information about the itapps mailing list