[Year 12 IT Apps] Sample exam questions andentity-relationship diagrams

[Mark KELLY]

Yes, boiling down the NFs for kids is the big issue.  In the past I've
boiled it down to soup level: "normalisation is removing data redundancy,
increasing database efficiency, and maximising data access by creating
separate related tables. Here's an example.  It's a good idea. Let's move
on..."

Kids can handle that.

I already know what the looks on my kids' faces will be if I delved any
deeper into 1,2,3 NF. I really doubt the benefit of such a venture in ITA,
considering our typical clientele.  Some of them still have trouble telling
the difference between efficiency and effectiveness.  Six of my 24 kids are
ESL and don't understand the word "appropriate".

Most of them find databases quite challenging enough without making matters
more painful with NF-level theory.

By the looks of the sample exam
questions<http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/vce/studies/infotech/it-applications/publications/IT-Apps-samp.pdf>my
ITA kids are going to be seriously troubled. I'm guessing a question
like
3c is going to score about 0.01 marks out of 2 on average across the state.
I wonder what the success rate would be amongst ITA teachers for that
question... To get my kids to answer it well, I'd need to spend at least two
periods (more like a week) just on normalisation theory - and frankly, it's
not worth it.

IMO, such levels of complexity do not sit well with VCE level. Even my SD
kids would have trouble with this.  Sure: ask kids why normalisation is a
good idea, but to differentiate the different levels is overkill, I think.

If I had to choose between spending a week on normalisation, and a week on
key fields and 1-to-many relationships (and we all *do* need to decide
this), I know where I'll spend my valuable class time.

Sorry for being grumpy about this, but this level of complexity really does
not suit ITA.  I don't mind normalisation being a bit of key knowledge, but
how it might be examined seems excessive.

Woof!
Grumpy Mark K

On 1 April 2011 17:08, Timmer-Arends <timmer at melbpc.org.au> wrote:

>  Hello Mark
>
> I'm curious to know what these conflicting sources are.
>
> I've followed Robert H's link and the page one gets to doesn't actually
> define them but does describe a (simplified) process to get to each NF - and
> what one gets from the process does conform with NF defs. The links from
> this page do go to definitions and they are in agreement with other sources
> I have looked at.
>
> Mark K's quote is a definition of 2NF that conforms to other definitions.
>
> The only difference I can see between various versions I have read is the
> degree of mathematical/academic gobbledy-gook involved.
>
> 1NF, 2NF and 3NF were defined way back in the seventies and because they
> were formed from a theoretical basis I don't think they are going to have
> changed all that much.
>
> About the only thing that seems to have changed greatly is the addition of
> another three NFs.
>
> I think the issue is a problem with the question, not with the consistency
> of the definitions. Decoding the definitions for consumption by students is
> of course another matter...
>
> Regards
> Robert T-A
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Mark Scott <msc at luther.vic.edu.au>
> *To:* Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing List<itapps at edulists.com.au>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 01, 2011 2:45 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Year 12 IT Apps] Sample exam questions
> andentity-relationship diagrams
>
>  Paula
>
>
>
> This is good stuff but we are still struggling with Question 3c
>
>
>
> Any chance of a VCAA definition of what actually goes in 1NF, 2NF and 3NF.
>
>
>
> The definitions are different depending on which “source” you use.
>
> thanks
> Mark Scott
> Luther College
>
> PS I suppose we could all wait for the guru (Mark Kelly) to provide an
> answer. J
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:
> itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au] *On Behalf Of *Christophersen, Paula P
> *Sent:* Friday, 1 April 2011 1:32 PM
> *To:* Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing List
> *Subject:* [Year 12 IT Apps] Sample exam questions and entity-relationship
> diagrams
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues
>
>
>
> The examination specifications and some sample questions focusing on new
> content in the study design are now on the VCAA website:
>
>
>
>
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/vce/studies/infotech/it-applications/publications/IT-Apps-samp.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
> Structurally the examination remains the same – two sections: Section A
> multiple choice; Section B short and extended responses.
>
>
>
> I draw your attention to a couple of matters in the sample questions:
>
> ·         Question 4 focuses on an entity relationship diagram – this
> hopefully clarifies recent concerns that have been raised.
>
> ·         Question 7 illustrates one way in which the examination can deal
> with the choice of different software in Unit 4, Area of Study 1. Here a
> common question is presented, and students select the software tool to
> explain their answer.
>
> ·         Question 9 is an example of an extended response (worth 8 marks)
> with prompts to guide answers
>
> ·         Question 12 is an example of the scope of a question on RDBMS –
> the focus can only extent to what is covered in Unit 3. Again it illustrates
> an extended response with prompts
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Paula
>
>
>
> Paula Christophersen
>
> ICT Curriculum Manager
>
> VCAA
>
> 41 St Andrews Place
>
> EAST MELBOURNE 3002
>
> (03) 9651 4378
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
Mark Kelly
Manager of ICT, Reporting, IT Learning Area
McKinnon Secondary College
McKinnon Rd McKinnon 3204, Victoria, Australia
Direct line / Voicemail: +613 8520 9085, Fax +613 9578 9253
kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
VCE IT Lecture Notes: http://vceit.com
Moderator: IT Applications Edulist

All generalisations are false, except this one.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/itapps/attachments/20110401/ce0564d7/attachment.html