[Systems Engineering Teachers' Mailing List] Draft VCE Systems Engineering Survey ... A bit of a joke.

[Alexandre Roujnikov]

Hi Ken and "comrades in arms",

1. I have completed the survey and stressed some valid points you have mentioned below such as: what is the preferable software/hardware to use (PIC or Adruino), print a new textbook with more practical projects described (with examples of hardware and programs ), more emphasis on electronic and IT applications. And I also "begged" to remove restrictions on "mechanical/electronic/electrical systems only" in Units 3/4. I also  suggested to change assessment tasks in Unit3/4 or give more details for their implementation and resources. In Unit 4 test in "all areas of studies" may be more relevant as part of preparation for Exam? So, I am happy to learn that you hope to move more "modern" way.

2. And we need more resources to support the new Study Design: text book and some handouts.

3. At the same time the current and "prospected" Systems   Engineering s study designs are much, much better than predecessor, which was really a "laughing stock". And we have a decent text book now. Let's hope our "Wish list" to improve will be taken into account.

4. Using this opportunity I also want to appeal to those SE teachers who did not complete survey. Please find time and complete it. We may succeed in improving  design making it updated, not as broad and sometimes as vague as the current one.


Regards,
Alexandre Roujnikov,

SE, Physics teacher.
Penola Catholic College


________________________________________
From: syseng-bounces at edulists.com.au [syseng-bounces at edulists.com.au] on behalf of Bell, Kenneth C [bell.kenneth.c at edumail.vic.gov.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 June 2017 11:20 AM
To: syseng at edulists.com.au
Subject: [Systems Engineering Teachers' Mailing List] Draft VCE Systems Engineering Survey ... A bit of a joke.

This is one of my very few conversations on this edulist.

Many of the systems engineering teachers may have received an invitation to participate in a survey for the draft study design.

Having downloaded the draft and summary of proposed changes, I decided to complete the surveymonkey to vent my spleen at another disappointing draft study design.

I should not have been surprised when I found this survey to a fairly limited survey on a few particular aspects of the study design. It is quite obvious that the panel are really happy with the current design and do not want changes. They are obviously happy that Systems Engineering remains a boutique subject taught by a small number of schools when it should be a mainstream subject taught in nearly every school.


Since there was lack of consultation in this survey, I would like to make offer some recommendations (knowing full well that they will be ignored).



•         Make sure the Key Knowledge leaves both the teacher (and the student) to what depth they have to know each concept.
(For example: the use of the words “Function and Operation” is just too vague and leaves the teacher and the student in the dark about how much depth they should know each electrical and mechanical component.


•         Unit 3:  Get rid of the current Area of Study 2 on Clean Energy technologies (Such a vague area of study which again is confusing, particularly the assessment task. How does this equate to what students should study for in the end of year exam?).
Instead:
Area of Study 1: Should focus on Mechanical Principles
Area of Study 2: Should focus Electrical\Electronic Principles
Area of Study 3: Students have to have submitted sufficient project evidence up to and including a chosen design option with justification for their chosen design option. (Just like ART has to do now for their SAT.)


•         Unit 4: Get rid of the current Area of Study 2 on New and Emerging technologies (Again, vague and really poorly resourced. Again, how does this equate to what students should study for in the end of year exam?).
Instead:
Area of Study 1: Should focus on Arduino or Picaxe micro-controller programming (best to have only one and I now believe Arduino is the way to go.).
Area of study 2: Completion of the student project (SAT).

SAT:
Get rid of the requirement that the project must integrate both mechanical and electrical components. Over the last couple of years, there have been Top Design exhibit that appeared to be purely electronic.
(2016 Synthesiser, 2015 Stringless laser harp, 2015 Guitar effects pedal).
So the requirement should be that the project integrates systems but does not need be both mechanical and electrical\electronic.
I feel the current requirement restricts students choice of projects as well as discriminates against school that do not have good metal work construction facilities.
Reduce the number of assessment components for the folio and speak English.  I feel that I have to translate the SAT assessment criteria into a language that students can actually understand.

Anyway, that’s my spleen vented. It does feel good to offer my recommendations, even  though I know nothing will change.


Ken Bell
Mortlake College




IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.



"LOVE one another and HELP one another" - St. Mary of the Cross Mackillop 1873


[Penola Catholic College Logo]

________________________________

This Email and any attachments may be confidential and, if you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information in this mail. If received in error, please notify us immediately and delete the Email and all copies. The college does not guarantee that this Email is virus or error free. The attached files are provided and may only be used on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the attached files, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not. The content and opinions in this Email are not necessarily those of the college.