[Informatics] A theory revision game

[Russo, Frank R]

Here you go Mark the first 50cents on your way to the million

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D24FDF.8CF54030]

Frank Russo
Mobile: 0409022197
Work: 9781 7700
Daily Organiser
Teacher:- Computing, Informatics, Robotics, Mathematics & Psychology
AEU Branch President
Consultative & Planning Committee Member
[Monterey_Secondary_College_logo]
Silvertop Street
Frankston North
Victoria, Australia

From: informatics-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:informatics-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 1:36 PM
To: Year 12 VCE Informatics Teachers' Mailing List
Subject: [Informatics] A theory revision game

Hi, time-fillers

This is a true story.

Since I gave up teaching, I have a recurring bad dream that I am teaching again, and I am wandering around a school, late for class, but unable to find the right classroom.
If I ever do locate the room, I realise that exams are a week away and I have not actually covered any of the course yet. I awake in a sweaty panic.

Last night, however, I actually had a pleasant and productive teaching dream.

My kids were playing a game called 'Key Knowledge Kwiz'.
It went something like this (with a little gap-filling done after I woke up)...

There are two competing teams - of 1, 2 or 3 kids per team. Or 4. Doesn't matter.

Each team prepares a list of IT theory questions that must have verifiably true or false answers. Maybe 5 questions per team member, plus some spares, just in case (as explained later).

(Because kids create their own questions, the teacher doesn't have to spend time in advance writing them. So the game can be sprung at any time, and the creative responsibility is squarely on the students' shoulders.)

Teams take turns to give the other team a question, e.g. "New York is one of the accepted citation styles."

The other team says whether the answer is true or false (for 1 point). Team members may confer before answering.

The answering team may then earn another 2 marks for either:
- correctly explaining why the answer is false. (e.g. "The style is 'Chicago', not "New York")
or
- if the answer was 'true', giving a correct and relevant Fun Fact (e.g. "Fun fact: another accepted style is IEEE").

A team is not allowed to pose a question that has either already been asked by the other team, or has already given as a Fun Fact.
So, using the examples above, neither team could then ask a question about 'IEEE' or 'Chicago'.

(This means that teams need to have some spare questions and/or improvise new ones if they suddenly find some of their questions are suddenly out of play. This adds a little improv spice to the game.)

To add difficulty, if a team mistakenly asks a question that does not actually have a true or false answer (e.g. "Is a large company subject to the Privacy Act 1988?"), the other team can challenge the question (for 2 points) and clearly explain why it is invalid (for 4 points), for example, "Objection! If it's a private company, its size is not relevant. It depends on whether the company turns over more then $3m a year or... etc"

(Question-setters will be more careful when framing their questions if they know they will give away twice as many points because they carelessly ask a faulty question.)

If there is a dispute over scoring, the audience can be the adjudicators and argue the merits of the question and/or answer until a crowd-sourced decision is agreed upon.

The teacher only needs to make a final arbitration in case the entire crowd is wrong - but the teacher needs to prove that the final judgement is valid.

After I woke up, I realised that the game may be useful to

(a) fill in time.
(b) help kids focus on very specific KK details.
(c) help them judge and deal with dodgy exam questions in section A where none of the available options is correct.
(d) anticipate common errors and frame questions to exploit them (as exams often do)
(e) stop the teacher talking all the time.

I must say that it was a pleasant relief from my usual horrible teaching dream.

Now, I'm not saying this game is on a par with Paul McCartney composing the tune of "Yesterday" as he slept, but if I don't soon get a few million dollars and a Kombi van filled with nubile groupies, I'll be mightily miffed.

Regards,
Mark

P.S. I guess this format could also be used for subjects other than IT.

--

Mark Kelly

mark at vceit.com<mailto:mark at vceit.com>
http://vceit.com

Powered by Bongo
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B4DRNqu3Y8sZVFlIY1NzaHV6M2M&revid=0B4DRNqu3Y8sZZ3RjZlZiWmpEejNTZ0xFL3puekphVGJSY0FBPQ]

IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/informatics/attachments/20161206/967507da/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17769 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/informatics/attachments/20161206/967507da/image001-0001.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32833 bytes
Desc: image002.png
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/informatics/attachments/20161206/967507da/image002-0001.png