[Year 12 SofDev] Industry practice - tertiary links

[andrew barry]

Hi,
Couldn't people here put forward their opinion on SD?
I prefer to just teach an IT subject which is just programming and some
programming design eg psuedo code.

Including so much theory doesn't get any student excited about learning IT
at Uni. After all we are trying to promote IT beyond yr12 are we not? Are we
not trying to get more people to do it?
Do we have the people in charge of the subject with this in mind?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Janson <
janson.adrian.a at edumail.vic.gov.au> wrote:

> Hi Steven,
>
> I think that links between the tertiary and secondary sectors need to
> become
> stronger for us to both move forward - and it would be great to have an
> extended dialogue with you about this when the time is right (which may be
> soon).  So if you are keen to help us onto the right track in terms of
> industry standard practice - then it would be great to chat!
>
> For now however, I think it is important not to confuse those working with
> and coming to terms with the current study design.  I have renamed this
> thread so that those who wish to ignore - simply can.  The current study
> design is what is important for the 'right now'.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
> Adrian Janson,
> VITTA President
> Director of ICT,
> Melbourne High School,
> Forrest Hill, South Yarra 3141 Australia.
> Phone: 03 9826 0711 International: +61 3 9826 0711
> Fax: 03 9826 8767 International: +61 3 9826 8767
> E-mail: janson.adrian.a at edumail.vic.gov.au
> Website: http://www.mhs.vic.edu.au
> Blog: http://jansona.edublogs.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:
> sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
> On Behalf Of Steven Bird
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 April 2008 11:04 AM
> To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Resource flows in a DFD
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Mark Kelly <kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au>
> wrote:
> >  That's what concerns me.  We are marking things right or wrong
> according
> to
> > a set of sometimes-arbitrary rules and definitions that sometimes only
> apply
> > in our little world of VCE theory.  An outsider in The Real World could
> well
> > argue that our answers are either moot or just plain wrong according to
> best
> > practice.
> >
> >  Our definition of the SDLC, for example, is just one of many, yet we
> ask
> > very specific questions about it that can rule all other SDLC variants
> > incorrect.
>
> For effective assessment, I think we need to focus on knowledge and
> skills that are relevant and well-codified.  As a body of knowledge, I
> don't think the SDLC scores very highly on either measure.  There are
> many other practical and interesting topics that could be covered.
>
> A possible starting point is to consider the relationship between the
> VCE and university curricula.  From where I stand, it seems very odd
> that VCE would include aspects of our third year subjects as they were
> taught 10-20 years ago.  Could we find ways to migrate our first-year
> curriculum into VCE/VELS?
>
> By the way, here is what Melbourne University does in first year IT,
> as of 2008:  http://informatics.unimelb.edu.au/
> I guess I might have some of your 2007 students.  :)
>
> Steven Bird
> http://www.csse.unimelb.edu.au/~sb/<http://www.csse.unimelb.edu.au/%7Esb/>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html  -
> VITTA
> Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
>
>
> Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
> received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening
> or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any
> loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender
> or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files
> our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
> and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood
> Development.
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html  -
> VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20080416/c1b58866/attachment-0001.html